eBASE, effective basic services:Outdoor Adventure Learning

Outdoor Adventure Learning

Unclear impact for moderate cost based on insufficient evidence
Implementation cost
Evidence strength
Impact (months)

Outdoor adventure learning typically involves outdoor experiences, such as climbing or mountaineering; survival, ropes or assault courses; or outdoor sports, such as orienteering, sailing and canoeing. These can be organised as intensive residential courses or shorter courses run in schools or local outdoor centres.

Adventure education usually involves collaborative learning experiences with a high level of physical (and often emotional) challenge. Practical problem-solving, explicit reflection and discussion of thinking and emotion (see also Metacognition and self-regulation) may also be involved.

Adventure learning interventions typically do not include a formal academic component, so this summary does not include forest schools or field trips.

1. The current evidence base on outdoor adventure and academic outcomes is very weak. While the studies that do exist show positive impacts, the limited evidence base means that an impact in months progress is not communicated.

2. The evidence in the Toolkit is primarily focused on academic outcomes. There is a wider evidence base indicating that outdoor adventure learning may have positive impacts on other outcomes such as self-efficacy, motivation and teamwork. Outdoor adventure learning may play an important part of the wider school experience, regardless of any impact on academic outcomes.

The limited number of studies mean that there is not enough security to communicate a month’s progress figure. While the studies included have positive impacts, none have been independently evaluated.

It is important to remember that this is not evidence that outdoor adventure learning has no impact” but that there is an absence of secure evidence of what the impact might be.

Outdoor adventure learning studies report wider benefits in terms of self-confidence and self-efficacy. The searches in the Toolkit look for studies that include an academic impact, so there may be a greater number of studies that focus on non-academic outcomes.

Similarly to the global evidence base, the impact of outdoor adventure learning on educational outcomes has rarely been investigated in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Though some schools carry out outdoor adventure learning (such as excursions), there is limited evidence available on the impact of such activities on educational outcomes.

A small-scale study conducted in South Africa suggests that the participation in outdoor learning interventions may have a positive impact on pupil’s emotional intelligence. A study conducted across schools in three cities in Nigeria suggests that the use of outdoor educational activities can facilitate social studies more effectively than traditional teaching instruction by helping students to understand first-hand the negative impacts of ethnocentrism, stereotyping, prejudice and discrimination.

Outdoor adventure learning approaches vary widely. A potential mechanism for impacting pupil outcomes might be through the development of non-cognitive skills such as resilience, self-confidence and motivation. When implementing outdoor adventure learning schools might consider including:

  • Activities that challenge pupils physically (and emotionally).
  • Opportunities for collaborative learning, problem-solving and explicit reflection on thinking processes and emotions.
  • Support for pupils to overcome challenges and experience success.
  • Building on the relationship between adult and pupils once everyone is back in school

Given the limited evidence base, it is particularly important to monitor impacts where outdoor adventure learning is used as a method of improving attainment.

Outdoor adventure learning interventions range in duration. They include shorter courses run within school, or at local outdoor centres; regular sessions over a prolonged period; or more intensive residential courses typically delivered over the course of one or two weeks.

Pupil numbers, staffing, activity and transport costs will determine the cost of an intervention. Overall, costs are likely to be moderate.

Implementing outdoor adventure learning will require a moderate amount of staff time compared with other approaches. Outdoor adventure experiences should be delivered by well-qualified staff with appropriate safeguarding in place to manage any physical risks to pupils.

Alongside time and cost, school leaders should consider how to maximise the positive impact of outdoor adventure learning on pupil’s non-cognitive skills in the classroom. 

The security of the evidence around Outdoor Adventure Learning is rated as extremely low. For topics with extremely low evidence, a month’s progress figure is not displayed. Only 9 studies were identified that met the pre-specified inclusion criteria. None of these studies were independently evaluated.

There is a paucity of research evidence on the impact of outdoor adventure learning on educational outcomes in SSA. The evidence is very limited. Robust randomized trials are therefore recommended to build the evidence base and to ascertain the impact of outdoor adventure learning interventions on educational attainment.

Evidence strength
Number of studies9
Review last updatedJuly 2021